7. Exhibits

Exhibit 001A

 
 
 
 
Exhibit 001B
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 001C
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 002
 

The untold story of female immigration to New France
 
Most of us are familiar with the story of the King's Daughters or Fille Du Roi; the state sponsored program that brought almost 800 single women to Québec in the early days of the French settlement, but what is not so well known is the story of the Fille a Marier.  Between 1634 and 1662; 262 young ladies braved the elements to begin an uncertain future in the backwoods of Canada.
 
When the Company of 100 Associates began their settlement scheme, their plan of recruiting only families proved to be too costly, so instead they signed on single men; tradesman and labourers; who would be indentured for three years.  However, this meant that more than 80% of the colonists were men, so even if they decided to stay at the end of their term, there was little hope of them starting a family, unless they chose a Canadian girl (Indian). But, since her family would never allow her, or her children, to leave their village; the company directors needed to avoid this from happening.
 
So instead, they began recruiting "marriagable young girls", who would first sign a contract in France and then be given passage and a small dowry to become the wife of a Québec settler.  You might wonder why these young girls (many under 16), would risk the dangers and hardships, which by now most of France were well aware of; but believe it or not; for many it was the best option.
 
At the time, marriages were arranged, so if the girl's family did not have the means to provide a suitable dowry, her only option was to become a nun, if she was Catholic; or marry beneath her station.  In the case of the young Filles a Marier, though a marriage contract must be signed before departure, she had every right to refuse the union, once she met her husband-to-be.  As a matter of fact, many of them did just that, and were provided safe passage home.
 
Below is a list of all the women brought over under this plan.  Some were sponsored by their church, a company associate or merchant.  Others were of minor noble families; cousins or sisters of men already in the colony.  Marguerite Bourgeoys and Jeanne Mance, also escorted several, training them in the necessary domestic skills, and ensuring that they would be well looked after.  Later, critics of the plan tried to say that all the girls were prostitutes taken off the streets of Paris, but this was rarely, if ever, the case.  Most settled down, raised families and formed the roots of many French-Canadian families.
 
Meet the Filles A Marier:
 

Achon, Ozanne-Jeanne (Anne)
Alton, Étiennette or Antoinette
Anet, Jeanne
Armand, Marie
Arneau, Jeanne (Marie-Marthe)
Arnu, Marthe
Artus, Michelle
Aubert, Marguerite
Banne, Gillette
Banse, Marguerite
Barbeau, Suzanne
Barré, Gabrielle
Beaucier, Jeanne
Beaudoin, Madeleine
Beaudry, Perrine
Bénard, Catherine
Bénard, Françoise
Benet, Marie-Suzanne
Bérard, Marie
Betfer or Bedford, Suzanne
Bidard, Marie
Bigot, Françoise
Bigot, Jeanne
Bigot, Marguerite
Bissonnet, Marie
Bitouset, Jeanne
Boileau, Marguerite
Boissel, Marie
Bonin, Marie
Borde or Desbordes, Jacquette
Boudet, Romaine
Bourdon, Marie
Bourgouin, Marie-Marthe
Boyer, Anne
Boyer, Marie
Breton, Marguerite
Brière, Jeanne-Angélique
Bugeau, Suzanne
Camus or Le Camus, Élisabeth
Camus, Catherine
Capel, Françoise
Cartier, Hélène
Cerisier, Jeanne
Chapelier, Marie
Charles, Catherine
Charlot, Marguerite
Châtaigné, Marie
Chatel, Hélène
Chaverlange, Jeanne
Chefdeville, Marie
Chevalier or Lechevalier, Anne
Cholet or Chaulet, Marie
Chotard, Jeanne
Colin, Catherine
Cousteau, Marie-Madeleine;
Crampon, Catherine
Crépeau or Crépel, Françoise
Crevet, Marie
D’Assonville, Gabrielle
De Lamarque, Anne
De Lambourg, Esther
De Liercourt, Anne-Antoinette
De Mousseau, Louise
De Poitiers, Marie-Charlotte
De Richecourt dit Malteau, Jeanne
Delaunay, Anne
Delaunay, Jeanne
Delavaux, Catherine
Deligny, Marie
Denoyon, Suzanne
Desbordes, Mathurine
Després, Anne
Després, Geneviève
Després, Marguerite
Desvarieux, Vincente
Doucet, Marie-Madeleine
Doucinet, Marguerite
Drouillard, Marie-Madeleine
Drugeon, Élisabeth
Dubois, Madeleine
Duchesne, Nicole
Duguay or Dugué, Jeanne
Dumesnil, Marie
Dupont, Marie-Madeleine
Durand, Anne-Antoinette
Duteau dit Perrin, Marie-Michelle
Duteau, Madeleine
Duval, Louise
Duval, Suzanne
Duverger, Françoise
Duverger, Suzanne
É mard, Anne
Fabrècque, Madeleine
Fafard, Françoise
Fayette, Marie
Ferra, Marie
Forestier (Fortier), Catherine
Fougerat, Charlotte
François, Marie-Madeleine
Freslon, Jacqueline
Frit, Marie
Gachet, Marie
Gamache, Geneviève
Garnier or Grenier, Louise
Garnier, Jeanne
Gauchet de Belleville, Catherine
Gaulin, Marguerite
Gausse dit Le Borgne Françoise
Gelé, Louise
Girard, Marie
Giraud, Isabelle dit Marie
Gobinet, Élisabeth dit Isabelle
Godard, Jeanne
Godard, Marie
Godeau, Marie
Godin or Bodin, Jeanne
Godin, Perrine
Gouget, Catherine
Grandin (Grandry), Marie
Grandry, Marie
Grenier, Antoinette
Grenier, Françoise
Grignault dit Gobineau, Marie
Guillebourdeau, Marguerite
Hagouin, Élisabeth
Hardy, Marie-Anne
Hautreux, Marthe
Hayet, Marguerite
Hérault, Jeanne
Herlin, Anne
Houart, Catherine
Hubert, Marie-Marthe
Hubou, Barbe
Hubou, Françoise
Hurault or Hurelle, Catherine
Jaleau dit Ploumelle, Jeanne
Jamare, Marie
Jarel or Jaroux, Suzanne
Jarousseau, Suzanne
Jobin, Françoise
Joly, Marie
Jopie, Anne
Lagrange, Jacqueline
Lamoureux, Antoinette dit Louise
Landeau, Marie-Noëlle
Languille, Marie
Latour dit Simonet, Catherine
Le Flot, Michelle
Le Laboureur, Anne
Leboeuf, Marguerite Marthe
Lebreuil, Louise-Thérèse-Marie
Leclerc, Adrienne
Leclerc, Marguerite
Leclerc, Marie
Ledet or Léodet, Anne
Lelièvre, Françoise
Lemaître, Denise
Lemoine or Le Moyne, Anne
Lemoine or Le Moyne, Jeanne
Lerouge dit St-Denis, Jeanne
Leroux, Mathurine
Leson, Anne
Letard, Marie
Longchamp, Geneviève
Loppé, Renée
Lorgueil, Marie
Lorion, Catherine
Lotier (Lothier), Catherine Maclin, Marguerite
Macré or Maqueray, Geneviève
Manovely de Rainville, Geneviève
Marchand, Catherine
Marecot (Marcotte), Madeleine
Marguerie, Marie
Martin, Anne
Mathieu, Catherine
Mazouer or Mazoué, Marie Méchin, Jeanne
Méliot, Catherine
Mercier, Jeanne
Merrin or Mairé, Jeanne
Méry, Françoise
Mésangé, Marie
Métayer, Marie
Meunier, Françoise
Michelande, Madeleine
Migaud, Suzanne
Mignon, Jeanne
Morin, Claire
Morin, Françoise
Morineau, Jeanne
Morisseau, Marg-Madeleine
Mullois de Laborde, Madeleine
Nadreau, Françoise-Jacqueline
Nau de Fossambault, Michelle
Nau-Fossambault, M-Catherine 
Oudin, Marie
Pacreau, Marie
Panie, Isabeau
Panie, Marie
Paré (Paris), Claire-Françoise
Parenteau or Parentelle, Marie
Patou, Catherine
Paulo, Marie
Pavie, Marie
Pelletier or Peltier, Marie
Pelletier, Jeanne
Péré, Marie or Marie-Suzanne
Perrault, Marguerite-Cécile
Perrine Thomas, Marguerite
Picard, Marguerite
Picoté de Belestre, Perrine
Pinet de La Chesnaye, Marie
Pinson, Marie-Marthe
Poireau, Jeanne
Poisson, Barbe
Poisson, Mathurine
Pomponnelle, Marie
Pontonnier, Marie
Potel Jacqueline
Pournin or Pournain, Marie
Radisson, Élisabeth
Radisson, Françoise
Rebours, Marguerite
Renaud, Marie
Renaudeau, Judith-Catherine
Renaudin Blanchetière, Marie
Reynier, Christine
Richard, Marie
Rigaud, Judith
Riton, Marie
Rocheron, Marie
Rocheteau, Suzanne
Rolland, Nicole
Rousselier, Jeanne
Roy, Jeanne
Roy, Marie
Saint-Père, Catherine
Saint-Père, Jeanne
Saulnier (Duverdier), Françoise
Sauviot, Marguerite
Simon, Marie
Sinalon, Jeanne
Soldé, Jeanne
Soulinier, Marie
Surget, Madeleine
Targer, Élisabeth (or Isabelle) Taupier, Marie
Testard, Jeanne
Teste, Marie
Thavenet, Marguerite-Josèphe Therrien or Terrier,
Tourault, Jacquette
Triot, Marie-Madeleine
Trotin, Marie
Valade, Marie-Barbe
Vauvilliers, Jeanne
Videau, Anne
Vié dite Lamotte, Marie
Viger, Françoise
Vignault, Jeanne
Vivran or Vivier, Jacquette
Voidy, Jeanne

 
 
Exhibit 003
 

Catherine Lorion, a valorous pioneer !

by Antonio Di Lalla, Quebec, Canada
 



The founding of Ville-Marie [1]  is characterized by the importance of the role played by some famous ladies of whom Jeanne Mance [2], Marguerite Bourgeoys [3] and Jeanne Le Ber [4] who came to set the social basis of Quebec's metropolis in an era when philosophers questioned  the intelligence of  women. As society turns out to be the sum of its members, following the example of their leaders, hundreds the other heroic women contributed to the construction of Montréal : Catherine Lorion was not the least.

 



Childhood and youth in Aunis



Ste-Soulle was a small village a few leagues away from La Rochelle in Aunis and under its estate management and election, bounded in the North by the Marais Poitevin and in the South by the Charente river. The conglomeration which owes his name to sainte Soline, an Early Christian martyr who lived in the IIIth century, thus setting the origin of the village in the Gallo-Roman era.



Catherine Lorion was born in this village of 335 persons between the years 1636 and 1638, stemming from the marriage of Mathurin Lorion and Françoise Morin/Morinet. She unfortunately lost her mother at an early age, leaving her orphan with her younger sister Marie. Her father Mathurin [5] married Jeanne Bizet on May 2, 1649 in La Rochelle. Seven half brothers and sisters arose from this union. 



City builders of Ville-Marie



Catherine leaves adventurously family, friends and land.  Under the call of  Sieur de Maisonneuve [6], she embarks in St-Nazaire, on the St-Nicolas-de-Nantes on June 20, 1653 [7] with some 100 participants of the Grande Recrue [8], including Marquerite Bourgeoys.



The intention of Sieur de Maisonneuve was to repel Iroquois and to establish solidly the city colony of Ville-Marie.  For this purpose, he wanted to take with him no one but young, sturdy and brave men, ready to take up arms as well as prepared in a profession necessary or useful to the new establishment. Recruited in Picardie, Champagne, Normandie, Ile-de-France,  Touraine, Bourgogne, Maine and Anjou, surgeons, millers, carpenters, masons, gunsmiths, brewers, confectioners, shoemakers, etc. undertook for a term anywhere from three to five years with the Compagnie de Montréal for wages varying to one's trade.


A dozen brave young ladies, aged from 10 to 32 accompanied Marguerite Bourgeoys in this adventure : Catherine Lorion was one of them.

The Recrue landed on November 16, 1653 ; winter had already begun. The cheerfulness which burst out at the arrival of this recruit illlustrates the city's weakness. Indeed Ville-Marie was completely incapable to increase the number of the colonists, having nothing to offer other than  the inseparable hardships due to the extreme poverty which was bore, and the Indian attacks to which one was exposed ceaselessly. 

Of the 95 who crossed on the St-Nicolas, 24 were massacred by Iroquois; 4 drowned ; one burnt when his house caught fire [9].

The situation of Ville-Marie in 1653

Hardly ten years after its founding, Montréal was dying. The number of victims caused by the Iroquois assaults increased ceaselessly and, in the testimony of the Père Ragueneau, it is hardly if the colony counted fifty Frenchman, all together in the Hotel-Dieu hospital and the fortification. " Iroquois, he tells, threatens our part of the country. One can feel everywhere their inhumanity (sic) and go more and more continuing their fury, not only against the rests of Algonquins and the Hurons, but presently turn their fury against our French houses. "[10]  After their massacre of Huron villages, it is indeed on Ville-Marie that Iroquois rushed, where a handle of Montréalistes waited for them heroically. In 1651, the Père Ragueneau clarified: " It is a miracle that the Frenchmen of Ville Marie were not exterminated by the frequent surprises of the Iroquois troops often times strongly supported and driven away. " [11] The Ville-Marie's condition, in 1653 , was distressing, dying. Jeanne Mance herself said that no help from France had come for the previous two years, and that fear and dismay were everywhere in this rising colony. In July, three weeks only after a peace settlement was concluded between Onneiouts and two Iroquois nations, 600 Agnié warriors walked on Ville-Marie, resolving to attack and destroy it. They indeed attacked the village but were strongly driven away ; they gathered no other advantage than a few savages (sic) and some Frenchmen who happened to be aside. [12]

On November 16, 1653, together with the pioneers of The Grande Recrue, Catherine landed off the St-Nicolas-de-Nantes facing these harsh conditions.[13]

In Ville-Marie, the young lady lived in the fortification among hundred inhabitants, but under the steering of Mother Bourgeoys who prepared her for the harshness of her new life.

On October 13, 1654, in the presence of Lambert Closse [14], Catherine married Pierre Vilain. Misfortune strocked. A few months after the wedding, Pierre was crushed down to death by a falling tree.  Young widower, alone, needy, Catherine had to start all anew in this miserable settlement.

On June 29, 1655, Sieur de Maisonneuve led Catherine to the altar to wed Jean Simon. On September 3, 1656, Catherine gave birth to Léonard, first son, bearer of hope, an enjoyment shared by all the Marian community : Paul de Chomedey, Sieur de Maisonneuve and Jeanne Mance held the child over the font.

Wretchedly, this happiness will last little! On November 24, hardly two months after the birth of the baby, Jean drowned in the stormy St-Laurent. Nineteen years old, widower for the second time, mother of an infant child, Catherine needed to survive without the support of her family, in this wild and inhospitable country.

Life took its rights again. On April 9, 1657, Catherine got married to Nicolas Milet dit le Beauceron, carpenter and pit-sawyer engaged by The Grande Recrue of 1653.  In all due respects, Nicolas signed an agreement with his young wife to the benefit of the son of the late  Léonard Simon who would be raised as his own son and will be called Léonard Simon Millet.  Happiness still seemed possible.

Family reunion

In 1658, after an estrangement which will have lasted 5 years, Mathurin, Catherine's father, landed in Nouvelle-France with his wife Jeanne Bizet and his daughters Marie, daughter from his first wife Françoise Morin ; Jeanne, more or less 8 years old ; and Renée, a baby a few months old. Finally gathered with the members of her family, we can easily imagine the joy of our pioneer. on October 23, 1658, Mathurin signed a first farming lease, of a term of three years, [15] .Time after which the family has established on the Côte Ste-Anne in Pointe-aux-Trembles (2 arpents no 40 - French land measure close to an acre), a few leagues away downstream from the fortification.  At the time, each first colonist received a lot.

Nouvelle-France turned out to become an earth of hope. On January 25, 1660, Jean, son to Mathurin and Jeanne Bizet, was baptized. The only one of the two sons of Mathurin to survive childhood and thus perpetuate the surname Lorion-Laurion in Quebec, today spread out to the four corners of North America and, just return of things, even back in Europe, of which Switzerland.

Time flew. Catherine bore eight children to Nicolas : Catherine, Nicolas, Charlotte, Pierre, Jacques, unnamed, François and Jean. More misfortunes : two died at an early
age. The Milet's lived in the viscinity  of  Ferme-St-Gabriel owned by Congregation Notre-Dame.[16]

In January, 1671, Catherine and Nicolas married their eldest daughter Catherine, 13 years of age, to Jean Reynau dit Planchard. The Milet, Lorion, Delpué ( Renée Lorion), Simon, Reynau dit Planchard held tight links woven between the members of the family, already spreading out on four generations, all being close neighbours : Mathurin Lorion, head of the family ; Catherine Lorion-Simon-Milet, our heroine, Catherine Milet-Reynau dit Planchard, her daughter ; and the great-grandchildren.

Spell striked again. On March 8, 1674, Nicolas Milet dit Beauceron died in the glowing fire that destroyed the family house [17], two months after the birth of the couple's eighth child, Jean. Widowed for third time, without roof nor fortune, Catherine needed to assure the survival in her numerous family.

Forty years old, rich in her courage and determination, survivor, Catherine married Pierre Desautels dit Lapointe, widower of Marie Rémy and father of two boys. Strangely, Catherine had met two of her four husbands during the crossing on St-Nicolas-de-Nantes. Two sons arose from this last union: Pierre and Gilbert who assured a numerous descent.

In 1681, Catherine and Pierre possessed 1 rifle, 5 horned animals and 18 arpents in value.

On October 29, 1681, Léonard, stemming from Catherine's first wedding to Jean Simon, took for wife Mathurine Beaujean. The young couple settled as first neighbours of the grandfather Mathurin Lorion. The couple gave birth to twelve children. Adventurous, Léonard undertook from 1685 on, as trapper in the Canadian West, allowing him to draft pelts in Indian territory. Léonard committed on four occasions, leaving wife, mother and children in the constant fear of an accident or an assault ; let us remember that  travelling at the time was done on bark canoes by rivers and great lakes, while being constantly the prey of a rival Indian tribe. One can imagine easily Catherine's fears, she who had already undergone the loss of three husbands by means of a violent death.

On April 19, 1683, Mathurin Lorion, ploughman, father of Catherine and ancestor of all Lorion-Laurion's, died in the Hôtel Dieu of Montréal. He will have been married twice or thrice and been the father of 9 daughters and 2 sons.   Québec and North America owe him thousands of heirs.

Together, Catherine and her father will have had undergone bravely fates of life : death of Françoise Morin, separation during five years, reunion in Nouvelle France, establishment of the father near his daughter in Pointe-aux-Trembles. Mathurin threw into mourning his third wife, Jeanne Bizet ; his children Catherine, Marie, Renée and Jean ; numerous grand and great-grandchildren.
 
War tragedies
Life in Nouvelle France did not offer any respite. On July 2, 1690, Jean Raynau, son-in-law of Catherine, and Jean Delpué dit Pariseau, husband to her half-sister Renée, participated in a squad to fight a party of Iroquois in the Coulée Grou, behind Pointe-aux-Trembles. They had the misfortune to be surprised. Delpué was killed in the field of honor, while Reynau was captured. A year later, on August 27, 1691, Nicolas (younger son of Catherine) and his wife are arrested by an Indian party. One can easily imagine the horror lived by Catherine. Fortunately, these last ones will be released  eight days later. [18] As for Reynau, he is led to the Onneouits and burned alive! The burial will take place on November 2, 1694, four years after the arrest. He left his wife Catherine Millet, eldest daughter of Catherine, without financial resource, and 6 orphans to feed.
The last years
Pierre Desautels died on November 19, 1708. The couple will have shared 32 years of common life.
Twelve years later, four times widowed, mother of 11 children, Catherine passed away on April 20, 1720, at the respectable age, for the time, of eighty and some years. More than hundred descendants survived her :  Simon's dit Léonard, Thibault's dit Léveillée, Poutré's, Millet's, Raynaud's dit Blanchard, Gariépy's, Janot's, Lacombe's, Archambault's, Allard's, Lécuyer's and Desautels' dit Lapointe. Obviously, no Lorion's.
Would Quebec exist without the courage of these valorous women?
Epilogue
Over fifteen generations of Lorion's have lived in Montréal since Catherine's arrival, of which my grandchildren (12th generation by my mother Cécile Laurion ;15th generation by my wife Marie-Thérèse Besner, descendant of Catherine).
It is with pride that I honour one of the mothers of our people.
Antonio Di Lalla, descendant of Mathurin Lorion
 
[1] Montréal's original name.
[2] Knowned  as co-founder  of Ville-Marie, she instituted the Hôtel-Dieu, first  hospital in Montréal, nowaday a Université de Montréal medical center.
[3] Marguerite Bourgeoys (1620-1700) founded Ville-Marie's first school, where she educated both French and Indian children.  She founded the Congregation Notre-Dame, congregation of teaching nuns.  Furthermore, she heeled the sick and wounded, helped to defend the community, built numerous institutions and gave wise advice as well to the governors as to the peasants.  St Marguerite Bourgeoys was canonized in 1980.
[4] Ville-Marie's first cloistered nun.  She gave wise advice to many in Montréal.
[5] Mathurin Lorion married Françoise Morin/Morinet in about 1635 in Ste-Soulle.   Some authors talk of a second wedding in 1643 to Marie Barbier.
[6] Paul Chomedey, sieur de Maisonneuve founded Ville-Marie together with Jeanne Mance in 1642.  He took charge as first governor.
[7] Research by Institut francophone de généalogie et d'histoire de La Rochelle.
[8] AUGER, Roland.  La Grande Recrue de 1653.  Publications de la Société généalogique canadienne-française.  Mtl.  1955.
[9] idem
[10] Relations de 1650.  P. 28ss. In La Grande Recrue de 1653.
[11] Relations de 1651.  P. 2.  In  La Grande Recrue.
[12] AUGER, Roland.  La Grande Recrue de 1653.
[13] Some authors state that she was accompanied by her sister Marie, but there seems no proof of the latter living in Ville-Marie from 1653 to 1658.
[14] Ville-Marie heroe.
[15] TRUDEL, Marcel.  Le Terrier du Saint-Laurent en 1663.  Éditions de l'Université d'Ottawa.  1973.  P. 442.
[16] CHICOINE, Émilia.  La Maitairie de Marguerite Bourgeoys.  Fides.  P.92.
[17] Idem
[18] SOUCY, Roméo.  Aperçu d'histoire de Pointe-aux-trembles. 1974.  P. 27.
 
 
Copyright (c) 1998-2013 LAURION & Co. Tous droits réservés.
nlaurion@club-internet.fr




Exhibit 004


La Rochelle history
 










 

 
The region was first occupied 2000 years ago by the Romans, who established salt production - still an active local industry. There is little evidence of this early occupation however.

The town as we see it today came into being as a small fishing village in the 10th century. By the 12th century it had become an important port town on the west coast of France.

Importantly it also had a town charter enabling it some degree of independence and self-governance - for example certain tax exemptions and its own coinage.

Battle of La Rochelle

In June 1372, during the Hundred Years War between the English and the French, a substantial sea battle took place off La Rochelle, with the combined Spanish and French forces defeating an English fleet and removing the long-standing English pre-eminence in the seas off the french coast.

La Rochelle continued to prosper into the 15th century, a busy bustling port with active trade routes to England, Spain and Africa, based in part on the trades in salt and wine.

Entering the 16th century, La Rochelle became an important centre for protestants in France. This inevitably led to conflicts during the Wars of Religion that racked France at that time, and a siege of the city started in 1572 that only ended a year later with the end of the wars, at which time La Rochelle was made just one of three cities in France where protestantism could be practiced.

The active protestantism in the town contributed to its next stage of troubles, in 1627, when La Rochelle found itself in conflict with King Louis XIII.  Under the command of Cardinal Richelieu, the city was again sieged. The siege lasted 14 months, after which the conquered city lost many of its privileges. 

Siege of La Rochelle

The siege of La Rochelle, from 1627-1628, was the most terrible event in the town's history.  Louis XIII and Cardinal Richilieu wanted to suppress protestants in France, and La Rochelle was the centre of this activity.  Despite attempts at aid from the English, the siege held and the city was starved into submission - of a population of 28,000 before the siege of La Rochelle, only 5,000 were alive when it finished.

After the siege the city refound its earlier prosperity due to international trade - this time also including the 'new-territory' of Canada as an active trading partner.  La Rochelle also acted as a major departure point for emigrants to the new world.

With the end of the 18th century the importance of La Rochelle was waning, and much of the 'skyline' of city was as you can still see today.

Second World War

During the Second World War La Rochelle was an important naval base for the occupying German navy. At the end of the war it was the last city in France to be liberated - again only after an extended siege that lasted from September 1944 to May 1945. Remarkably little wartime damage occurred in La Rochelle.

The town prides itself on its rebellious history - the motto you will see often as you travel around is 'La Rochelle - belle et rebelle'.
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 005
 
 

Name:
Mathurin Lorion
Year:
1658
Age:
57
Estimated Birth Year:
abt 1601
Place:
Montreal
Family Members:
Daughter Marie 15; Wife Jeanne Bizette 37; Daughter Jeanne 11; Daughter Renee 1
Source Publication Code:
9221.17
Primary Immigrant:
Lorion, Mathurin
Annotation:
Catalog of Immigrants. Complements volume 3 of Histoire de la Nouvelle-France (History of New France). Date and port of arrival, date and place of intention to emigrate, or date and place of first mention of residence in Quebec. Extracted from records in
Source Bibliography:
TRUDEL, MARCEL. Catalogue des Immigrants, 1632-1662. Cahiers du Quebec  Collection Histoire. Montreal: Editions Hurtubise HMH, 1983. 569p.
Page:
390
 
 




Save This Record
Attach this record to a person in your tree as a source record, or save for later evaluation.
Save 

Source Citation: Place: Montreal; Year: 1658; Page Number: 390.

Source Information:

Gale Research. Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, 2010.

Original data: Filby, P. William, ed. Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s. Farmington Hills, MI, USA: Gale Research, 2010.

Description:
Updated annually, this database is an index to passengers who arrived in United States and Canadian ports from the 1500s through the 1900s. It contains listings of approximately 4,838,000 individuals and references thousands of different records compiled from everything from original passenger lists to personal diaries. For each individual listed, you may find the following information: name, age, year and place of arrival, and the source of the record. Learn more...
_________________________________________________________
 
 
Exhibit 006
 
 
___________________________________________________________________________
 
 
Exhibit 007
 
 
 
_________________________________________________________________________
 
Exhibit 008
 

The Migration and Settlement of Franco-Americans in New England: “Survivance” of the Crash  

Lisa D. Helstrom

 

Foundation of the People: Sterling and Virile  

            With a devout dedication to faith, family, and ancestral tradition, the French-Canadians can be considered a loyal group.  For their hardiness and willful labor, they can be credited largely for the conversion of the North America from a land of wilderness into cities and farms (Kalijarvi, pg. 132).  While their people inhabited land stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific, the settlement of French-Canadians in New England is primarily a social movement that has gone unrecognized and disregarded despite its great influence on American culture.  Public acknowledgement of French-Canadians stems mostly from their voting rights, but feelings of dislike toward this group have largely contributed to the unhappiness and ethnic crashing that started with emigration, but has lasting impacts even today.  Through their struggles in the U.S. political economy, the French-Canadians were determined to keep their three most cherished possessions: religion, language, and customs (Rollins, pg. 76).  This preservation attitude became known as “survivance” and cohesively kept the roots of the group in tact when crashing ultimately could have destroyed their ways.  

Historical Background
            The French-Canadians, more presently referred to with the politically correct term “Franco-Americans,” came to what is now the province of Quebec in the early part of the seventeenth century.  They are often confused with the Acadians and the French-Americans, both very different immigrant groups.  The Acadians traveled from France to what is now Nova Scotia and then from there were sent by the English to the Louisiana area in 1755.  The French-Americans, on the other hand, directly migrated from France to the United States (Rollins, pg. 75).  A large number of French-Canadian families remained in Quebec and their descendant families continue to be a large force in Quebec today.  A great migration, however, occurred in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries that brought French-Canadians south from Quebec into New England.  Demographically, the French made up the fourth largest minority group in the United States in the latter part of the twentieth century (Jacobson, pg. 641).   

            During the nineteenth century, Quebec’s agriculture began to see tremendous strains due to population growth and lack of available fertile farming land.  Between 1784 and 1844, Quebec’s population increased by about 400%, while its total area of agricultural acreage rose only by 275%, creating an important deficit of available farmland…Since Quebec was largely a rural society in the 19th century, agricultural problems were truly national problems (Bélanger, pg. 2).
Since Quebec’s most fertile farmland has been systematically occupied, a large number of French-Canadians were forced into colonizing peripheral and less-fertile lands.  Along with problems directly associated with the land, these French-Canadian farmers also faced difficulty in gaining access to markets and the trouble of having a very short growing season.  Farming became very unprofitable in peripheral regions and many French-Canadians needed to work in the timber trade during the winters in order to have enough funds to survive.  While this system of part-time work did provide the funds these farmers needed for their farms, a system of dependency resulted (Bélanger, pg. 3).  Timber barons, being major employees, were able to create a monopoly that struggling farmers had little choice but to enter. 
A more direct source of indebtedness of Quebec farmers came from low productivity and the fact that overwhelmingly Anglophone banking networks were primarily located in the cities and tended to lend money to the elite rather than local farmers (Bélanger, pg. 3).  Now, infertile land and insufficient funding caused the agricultural crisis to become devastatingly pronounced. 
Since the crisis for the French-Canadians essentially started after the defeat of Montcalm by Wolfe and the British in 1759, by the time severe indebtedness occurred the French population in North America had been on downward for quite some time (Rollins, pg. 76).  They were forced since 1759 to be subservient to a Protestant and English-speaking monarch that put them on the defensive and challenged their ability to comply with “survivance.”  The industrial calling from the United States seemed to be just the kind of change the French-Canadians needed. 

The Migration phase
While the largest phase of French-Canadian migration took place in the thirty years that followed the civil war, it is important to recognize the duties the French-Canadians provided to the United States during wartime.  The emigration of the French-Canadians to the Untied States actually began before the American Revolution.  A minor migration occurred due to the service of French-Canadians during the war.  Notably, a substantial amount of French Canadians fought for the colonies and for this service Congress gave the French volunteers a tract of land in upper New York State which was referred to as the “Refugee’s Tract” (Rollins, pg. 76).  The remaining phase of the minor migration occurred after the insurrection of 1837 in Quebec.  A portion of defeated citizens sought refuge in Vermont, forming the first small French-Canadian settlement in New England (Rollins, pg. 76).  After the civil war, however, the largest movement of French-Canadians took place.  It wasn’t until September 10, 1930 that the border was closed to French migration (Kalijarvi, pg. 133). 
            The major migration phase of the French-Canadians was massive, yet only lasted about sixty years.  It is suggested that as many as half may have returned home, but the individuals that stayed in the northeast remained devoted to their heritage.  With a strong religious calling, a major source of internal crash for the French-Canadians was simply the migration into a new culture where they needed to have clear sight of their goal to resist total assimilation.  
In the nineteenth century, nationalistic ideologues in Quebec developed the concept that French Canadians were duty bound to preserve their cultural identity.  For many, this notion became indistinguishable from the view that French-Canadians were called upon to fulfill a sacred mission, names to preserve Catholicism in America, and that this mission could best be accomplished by maintaining their mother tongue and customs, and by staying on the land (Brault, pg. 7). 

However, it was after the Civil War that people in the United States migrated westward and people from Canada began more successfully migrating to New England.  The major cause of this population shift and the explosion of French-Canadian immigration can be significantly attributed to the to the twelve Boston merchants who in 1813 started the famous Boston Manufacturing Company.  This group of major economic force hit upon the idea of starting a large integrated cotton mill for the mass production of cloth (Brault, pg. 54). 

When greater demands were placed on mill operatives, American born employees—primarily unmarried girls—began to abandon the textile mill kind of work.  While the jobs were filled for a short time by Irish immigrants, the positions were soon deserted again and factory managers drew heavily on the human resources of Quebec.  Due to the close proximity of Quebec to the mills, and the availability of cheap, rapid transportation by railroad, the labor growth was massive.  Among the attractions was the fact that factories had higher wages than jobs in the homeland.  Frequently there were no formal skills or education required, and factories often employed women and children.  Interestingly, the French-Canadians have the distinction of being the only major ethnic group to have successfully immigrated a sizeable number of individuals to the United States by train (Brault, pg. 54).  Physically, the immigration was very successful, but emotionally and spiritually settlement was an incredible challenge.  

Settlement: Little Canadas 
The French-Canadians carry a great sense of pride in their identity as it connects to religion and heritage.  Of the importance of this preservation, Gerard Brault writes: Imbued with a strict brand of Catholicism and convinced that preserving their cultural heritage involved a fight against long odds, a considerable number became absorbed in the group’s inner life and stood on the defensive in their relations with others throughout most of their history (Brault, pg. 1).          

Not only does a strong feeling of heritage make physical movement difficult, but also the emotional turmoil that French-Canadians faced when crossing territorial and cultural lines was immense.  The great migration took place at these great cultural, economic, and emotional costs. 
            A genuine characteristic of the early French-Canadian settlers was tendency of a town or parish to stay together.  Migration generally involved the entire family unit, and if one family left for the New England states, it was likely that the next family to leave would also head for the same community (Hendrickson, pg. 35).  The elite of Quebec did not support the settlement of French-Canadians in New England and condemned the dangers of urban life.  The French-Canadians compromised their settlement by entering the American social structure through the labor market, but also transmitting a French flavor to the communities they called “Little Canadas.”  These communities were predominantly French and Catholic and centered life around the church and school, creating an environment that appeared much like life in Quebec (Bélanger, pg. 8).  It is claimed frequently that the greatest force operating for group cohesion was the unique Canadian French tongue (Kalijarvi, pg. 134). 

Essentially, the French-Canadians migrated as families to New England only to attempt to resettle their lives as if they remained in Quebec.  As an ethnic group they were able to most resist Americanization as compared to all other ethnic groups that settled in the New England area: They have retreated into narrow ghettoes confining themselves to ingroup activities to avoid the major unpleasantness of community life and to shun open competition on unfair terms with those who discriminated against them economically, politically, educationally, and socially (Foley 1960: 11; Rollins, pg. 81)

Next in line to the family, the molding of the French-Canadian ethnicity is largely from the church and parish.  A study of Franco-American “survivance” and reconstruction would be severely lacking without an account of the historical development of parishes and the role that church played in the French Canadian experience.  Most “Little Canadas” would come to have a church inside their boundaries as the institution was held at the highest level of precedence (Hendrickson, pg. 37).  The massive push for ethnic-religious independence was a source of ethnic crash and rivalry primarily with the Irish Catholics who began immigrating to New England around 1845 following the potato famine (Rollins, pg. 78).  The difference between English and French sermons was a source of alienation for the French-Canadians and another reason to actually work toward segregation.  

Conflicts with the Irish-Americans and the development of Parishes
            Firstly, the Irish Americans began fearing the new competition associated with the French-Canadian migration movement.  Economically, the new group was a threat because they would work longer for less pay.  Almost forcibly, then, the French Canadians occupied the lowest social class allowing the Irish to move up in stratification.  The Irish blatantly looked down on the French-Canadians; these temperamental incompatibilities led to frequent clashes.  Rhea Coté Robbins, A Franco-American citizen of Waterville, Maine describes how her father in his youth in the 1930’s era used to go down to Augusta for the purpose of rumbling and engaging in street fighting with the Irish; the source of this fighting, Coté describes was a direct relation to the competition between the French and Irish over mill jobs (Personal email, Coté, 11/2/2005).  Even while the two groups were both Catholic, increased tension resulted from the demand of the French-Canadians for separate French-Speaking parishes (Rollins, pg. 78). 

The conflict which developed in many other sections of the nation as new immigrants insisted on their own ethnic churches led to the Cahenslyism movement.  Father Peter Cahensly and others demanded of Rome, that dioceses in the United States be set up along nationality rather than territorial lines.  The newcomers from Europe would then be served by pastor of the same background, and they would confess their sins and listen to sermons of their native tongue (Rollins, pg. 79).  Without this movement, the French Canadian status may have hindered the formation of ethnic churches. 
If the Irish curate were to request French-Canadian missionaries or curates then he would run the risk of displeasing the majority of his congregation—notably, a congregation that already felt hostility toward the French-Canadian immigrants for causing the rareness of jobs and the drop in labor wages (Roby, pg. 26).  American bishops assessed the number of applicants desiring a parish led by a French-Canadian and then proposed costs of erecting a church, a rectory and a school, and maintaining a parish priest.  Frequently these requests were affirmed: The statistics speak for themselves: the bishops granted 14 such authorizations from 1861 to 1870; 28 from 1871 to 1880; 23 from 1881 to 1890; and 19 during the last decade of the century (Roby, pg. 26). 

These parishes represented an extended family for the French Canadians and contributed to their extensive French-speaking existence. Philippe Lemay, a Franco American (the more modern and politically correct form of “French Canadian”) of Machester, New Hampshire describes:
In 1871, our first parish was established and our new church, St. Augustin’s, was opened in 1873.  A few years later, we had two parishes, so we really could practice our religious as easily as we did in old Quebec.  We said our morning prayer separately, but after supper, before the dishes were washed, we recited the beads and evening prayer en famille, father or mother alternating with the children and the boarders (Doty, pg. 27).  

This religious freedom was not felt without unsettlement: In 1889 the Catholic Council of Baltimore stressed that ‘It must always be remembered that the Catholic church recognizes neither north nor south, nor east nor west; nor race nor color.’  That Congress held that ‘national societies, as such, have no place in the Church of this country; after the manner of this Congress, they should be Catholic and American’” (Wade 1950: 185, Rollins, pg. 79).  

This view was violently opposed for many years by French-Canadian leaders, but compromises eventually evolved allowing the French parish to remain the strengthening factor of the French Canadian resistance to cultural depletion in the church.  It was feared that “survivance” would die due to Irish opposition; however, even today there are many French language parishes throughout New England.  It is even suggested that French-Canadians have enriched the area religiously and may be considered typical of New Englanders (Wade 1950: 191, Rollins, g. 80).  

Parochial Schools
            Below the church, schools rank next in importance.  The “survivance” attitude of French-Canadians quickly clashed with the unilingual schools in New England.  Rather than forcing their children to a learn a tongue different from that of his home and culture and entrusting the education of their children to “strangers,” the French Canadians established parochial schools to meet elementary and secondary school demands (Kalijarvi, pg. 135).  Here, the language of instruction was generally French.  Parochial schools not only taught standard subjects, but also strove to implant an ideology of how to live according to well defined rules—sparked by the Catholic faith (Brault, pg. 74).  These schools were often criticized for their simplistic view of life and tense discipline, but arguably were beneficial for immigrants aiming for “survivance” of their faith, language, and culture, all of which were at the very heart of their educational institutions. 

The system, however, which integrated language, religion, and education, lasted only until around 1960 when economic factors and the assimilation or moving of Franco-Americans to suburbia caused the French parishes and parochial schools to close one by one (Jacobson, pg. 643).  While present day language barriers are sparser, the initial transition period into the public educational system created cultural and linguistic hardship for Franco students that were not accommodated for.  Being bilingual was a disadvantage and the students were labeled as intellectually inferior (Jacobson, pg. 644). 

Decline of the “Little Canadas” and the increase of Americanization
The substantial preservation of culture did not fully mean that life in the United States was desirable for Franco-Americans.  The living conditions and the socio-economic status of the inhabitants of “Little Canadas” are described as being very poor.  French-Canadians rarely owned property and often lived in tenements that lacked amenities and were usually overcrowded.  “Little Canadas” had among the highest population densities in the United States (Bélanger, pg. 9). 

             A study conducted on the French Canadian population of Lowell, in 1875, indicates that about 52% were in very difficult economic circumstances.  Another study of wages paid in the cotton mills in 1908 shows that French-Canadian mill workers earned $10.09 a week on average.  This amount was between 5-25% lower than the wage earned by Irish, English, or Scottish mill workers (Bélanger, pg. 9).  Until the 1940’s it was possible to live and work in French in several small towns dotting New England, but by the middle of the 20th century, assimilation had become a reality (Bélanger, pg. 10).

            Among the reasons for the decline of Franco America is firstly the decline of French-Canadian emigration.  New arrivals often compensated for the losses of Franco Americans to assimilation, allowing Franco America to perpetuate itself.  When the American government put a stop to immigration in 1930 during the beginning phases of the depression (Bélanger, pg. 10), structurally Franco America was not able to continually reproduce its presence both physically and in terms of values.  A second major reason for the decline of Franco-America was the decline of the textile industry in New England.  From the beginning of the 20th century until the mid-1930’s the cotton industry began to relocate to southern U.S. states where labor costs were lower.  Subsequently, Franco-Americans were forced to leave their low paying jobs and tenements and enter a new labor force, ascending the social ladder.  As Franco-Americans left “Little Canadas” and sough out suburban life, the isolation of Franco American communities was broken and assimilation became a much quicker process (Bélanger, pg. 10).  

Politics and the War
            During the Civil War, an estimated 4000 Franco Americans fought for the Union and tens of thousands served the United States during World War One and Two.  It is suggested that Franco-Americans can be seen as both pushers for “survivance” and also as patriotic and native-like to the United States as more Franco-Americans fought for the U.S. in World War One than French Canadians did in the Canadian army (Bélanger, pg. 10). As far as loyalty and support of the war effort are concerned, the Canadian French take the view that the United States has been attacked…In industry and in the professions they are contributing their share for an American victory (Kalijarvi, pg. 137).   

            Naturalizing campaigns prompted a great number of French-Canadian immigrants to become United States citizens beginning in the late 1870’s (Brault, pg. 66).  Franco-American votes were often regarded as pivotal and over time the group has held every position of major political importance in the United States with the exception of the presidency and justiceship on the Supreme Court bench (Kalijarvi, pg. 136).  It is often questioned due to the strong ties that Franco-Americans have with their culture and each other why their political views were not unified.  The group did not exclusively band together for political influence—even so, there power in politics was and is substantial.   

A Micro Example of Franco-American Hardship: The Hathaway Shirt Company in Waterville, Maine 
Waterville’s own Hathaway shirt plant was the nation’s last major textile mill to close before moving production overseas.  Of this closure, Waterville citizen Rhea Coté describes the economic hardship that became increasingly problematic for Franco-American mill workers: The Retirement check of this woman after giving a lifetime to the sewing mill is 137 dollars a month, and after six months of retirement she no longer qualifies for health insurance.  She is forced to buy her own health insurance plan independently.  The shirts sell for $50 to upwards of $70 apiece in the men’s shops which sell quality clothing.  I was destined for the men’s shirt factory mill.  As so many of my neighbor women are destined (Coté, pg. 26).  

Hathaway employee, Vicki Gilbert, described to me in a personal interview in 2003 that she remained in the plant until she was literally pushed out the door.  After the closing, Gilbert experienced a sense of ethnic crash due to her lack of education which she says was a stigma of Franco-American mill workers.  Without a high school degree, Gilbert could hardly enter the labor market and was forced to go back to school after decades of being a mill worker.  Gilbert was happy in the mill and felt protected in a sense being among other Waterville citizens that frequently shared the Franco-American heritage.  The mill workers and Franco-Americans in general were described by Gilbert as a family, by blood or experience.  While the closing of the mill may have caused more assimilation of Franco-Americans in Waterville and perhaps less segregation, there seems to be a continuing struggle as to how the Franco-American culture will be preserved. 
 

Experiences of a Franco-American Waterville Citizen: Rhea Coté Robbins
Rhea Coté Robbins, author of Wednesday’s Child, describes through a memoir the life of a Franco-American family in the community of Waterville, Maine.  The city of Waterville both historically and in present day is a major site of ethnic crash.  Historically speaking of this great migration, Cote recognizes the idea of ethnic crash and contends:

“The migration of these sturdy French Canadian immigrants, often known as ‘Canucks’ was very puzzling and sometimes annoying to some native citizens.  Each year their number increased and the line of Yankees retreated…In the early days there was bitter feeling between the young men of the “Plains’ and the young men of the town…the struggle…stemmed from personal animosity and hatred…by the end of the 19th century, they had reached a point where their presence merited consideration” (Coté, pg. 48)

Coté further describes how the French culture did not prepare someone to “compete in the world of high finance…So Colby is safely tucked away from the onslaught of the French who took up residence in Waterville to work in the mills” (Coté, pg. 50).  Obviously, generations later, Coté’s family cannot change the fact that Colby College (which moved from downtown to Mayflower Hill) is permanently settled atop the hill and the French-Canadians have traditionally inhabited the lower area by the river.  This division, however, causes a great ethnic divide both physically and figuratively. 

            The unsettling relations in Waterville between Franco-Americans and “townsfolk” are described by Coté as actually focusing somewhat on French culture.  As a child, interactions with the higher class were actually issues that caused Coté to want to completely forget and/or change her ethnicity.  We see how ethnicity pushed Coté to act Whiter, crunched her into a part of town away from the elite on the hill, and broke her sense of pride[1][1]: All I want to do is run away from there and get myself another identity.  I want to be a white girl.  A girl from Mayflower Hill.  A girl with an English name.  An English identity.  An English sexuality.  An English sensibility.  An English everything.  Instead, I have French as French could be (Coté, pg. 62). These actions represent a micro example of ethnic crash, but also provide a template for the types of cultural differences that may have created ethnic crash for French-Canadians throughout New England during their migration and settlement phases. 

In personal discourse with Coté, she vehemently described that language for the oppressor/oppressing culture is a source of power for creating a barrier.  However, theoretically, it is the entire French culture and Franco-American ethnicity that is being attacked.  In Franco-American terms, having another language besides English came to be seen as a problem rather than an asset.  Oftentimes our society would consider being “other-languaged” besides English an asset, therefore, Coté describes that when we look at the Franco-American example from this perspective it is really being conveyed that being French is the problem (personal email, Coté 11/2/2005).  This is a direct ethnic resistance because in dealing with the oppressive group and their limited point of view toward the Franco-Americans, the instance of crash is in actuality a result of culture and not language.   

The Franco American Legacy
            Indisputably, the emigration of French-Canadians to New England has left an enduring mark.  Similarly, the immigrants whom returned to Quebec left a lasting impact on their homeland economy by returning with savings.  Within French Canada, “the emigrant became one of the prime vessels of transmission for the American culture” (Bélanger, pg. 11).  A very positive image of the United States was projected in Quebec thanks to the Franco Americans.  This is opposed to the anti-Americanism attitude sometimes characteristic of English-speaking Canada.  This positive attitude is felt even to this day.  In terms of their impact in the United States, the Franco-Americans strengthened Catholic institutions in New England and actively participated in the industrialization process.  While French is hardly spoken regularly in Franco America, the Roman Catholic faith has remained a stronghold (Bélanger, pg. 11).  Of the legacy of “survivance,” Rollins claims: The national status of the French-Canadians is higher than it is in New England.  As most of these people live in the six northeastern states, it becomes apparent that the few who have migrated to other sections have been quite successful in becoming ‘Americanized.’  These French Canadians have not been influenced by the ‘survivance’ ideal due to their being isolated from the majority (Rollins, pg. 95). 

When specifically examining the impact of the ‘survivance’ legacy on Franco Americans in New England, it is suggested that among the Franco Americans that reside there, the second generation has failed to keep pace with others ethnic groups in the Americanization process (Rollins, pg. 95).  The causes of this resistance to assimilation may have been the strong desire these immigrants had to keep their mother tongue upon arrival as well as their French culture; the fear of losing this culture would have meant losing the all-important Roman Catholic faith.  The price the French-Canadians paid for this preservation may have seemed worthwhile, but socially an imbalance resulted.  The French-Canadians lost one generation in the process of maintaining “survivance;” therefore, the third generation of Franco Americans roughly parallels the second generation among other immigrant groups in terms of the amount of Americanization they have undergone:

While the second generation Poles, Italians, and Irish were becoming ‘Americanized’ though maintaining their Roman Catholic Religion, the second generation French-Canadians were remaining French-Canadian in language and culture (Rollins, pg. 96).  

Tracing time: From soldiers to mill workers to declination and Present day
            The presence of Franco-Americans in the United States began firstly with their involvement in warfare and then extended when the group continued to establish itself with work in the textile industry.  Pressing forward to the era between the two world wars, Franco-Americans were still raised by parents who clung to traditional ways, however, as these children came into contact with children of other ethnicities they were exposed to mores and values that were different than those learned in the home (Brault, pg. 86).  Franco Americans institutions were in fact able to remain solid during the 1920’s and 1930’s. 

            Involvement with textile industry provided economic similarities among Franco-Americans while the establishment of parishes and parochial schools lent itself to voluntary segregation through development of “Little Canadas.”  By 1957, however, this intense group cohesion through voluntary segregation suffered a blow when the number of jobs in the textile industry dropped significantly and a financial crisis occurred.  This crisis resulted in older workers being eliminated and younger works feeling compelled to seek jobs in the suburbs (Roby, pg. 436).  This movement caused the populations of major industrial cities in New England to decrease dramatically.  Widespread anxiety then led the American Congress to adopt a generously funded program for urban renewal.  Certain cities were selected for renewal where the end result would be for developers to rebuild low-rent housing units as a priority on the sites of expropriation (Roby, pg. 437). 

Politicians hoped this urban renewal would facilitate re-housing for a majority of evicted property owners and tenants.  This proved to be rarely the case. 

            The Northern Canal Urban Renewal project demolished more than 200 buildings in Lowell, Massachusetts—for the most part in “Little Canada”—which displaced hundreds of families.  This urban renewal project became a catastrophe for parishes.  Families were often driven from their homes and were not able to return to the parish because of the unaffordable cost of renting a unit in the new buildings.  As a paradigm, this scenario became a widespread reality throughout New England.  A major indication of the decline of Franco America was the lack of parishes; no national parishes were founded since 1927.  For over thirty years injustices were inflicted on Franco-Americans and organizations of English inspiration actually worked to stifle Franco-American associations and brotherhoods.  Furthermore the elder generation was forced to stand down when:

They attacked the very source of our ethnic existence by restricting, then by Anglicizing, our clergy, as well as by controlling and Anglicizing our schools, using methods somewhat less Christian (Roby, pg. 455).  By 1976, after years of ethnic silencing, “Little Canadas” became a thing of the past both figuratively and physically. 

            While descriptions of migration and settlement tend to accentuate the concise ethnic solidarity and physical proximity of Franco-Americans, the contemporary Franco-American cannot fit into such a small box.  Today, some Franco-Americans remain in disappearing industries of fabric mills and shoe shops.  More progressively, though, Franco-Americans very actively cross all employment and educational lines.  The group is not confined to one sector of socio-economic life (Hendrickon, pg. 73).  Without a doubt this ethnic group has both benefited and suffered from the push for “survivance” and the subsequent force of Americanization.  Increased political activity and social mobility provide arguably positive structural impacts on Franco Americans.  On the other hand, the decline of ethnic parishes and bilingual education create a strain for contemporary Franco-American families striving to maintain “survivance” and portray traditional Franco values to their children exclusively. 

As with any issue of importance the ultimate fate of its survival truly depends upon the heart.  Even with French customs taking a secondary degree of importance to the American way, the Franco-Americans in New England are not in great danger of cultural death.  Newer generations of Franco-Americans may only wish to partly remember their heritage, but partial remembrance should not be seen with a pessimistic eye.  Dorothy Gallagher claimed in an article in the New York Times regarding the ideology of writing that as is true with story telling, the second you put a pen to paper, some element of the story is lost (Gallagher, 2002).  Sociologically, the active preservation of culture can be viewed in the same light.  The forest of Franco-Americans may not be as dense as it once was, but fundamentally is not being clear-cut.  Franco-American roots have most definitely proven their strength and with these roots there shall be no fear that ancestors will be forgotten.   

Works Cited  

Brault, Gerard J. The French-Canadian Heritage in New England:. Hanover: University P of New England, 1986. 1-282. 

Bélanger, Damien-Claude. "French Canadian Emigration to the United States, 1840-1930." Feadings in Quebec History. 23 Aug. 2000. Marianoplolis College. 2 Nov. 2005 http://www2.marianopolis.edu/quebechistory/readings/leaving.htm

Coté Robbins, Rhea. "Franco-American Project." E-mail to Lisa D. Helstrom. 2 Nov. 2005. 

Doty, C. Stewart. The First Franco-Americans: New England Life Histories from the Federal Writers' Project 1938-1939. Orono: University of Maine at Orono P, 1985. 1-161. 

Foley, Albert S. 1960.  Survey of Collation of Research in Inter-religious Relations.  Unpublished paper, Spring Hill College.   

French Canadians in the United States.  Thorsten V. Kalijarvi
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 223, Minority Peoples in a Nation at War. (Sep., 1942), pp. 132-137.
Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002- 7162%28194209%29223%3C132%   3AFCITUS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9  

Gallagher, Dorothy. "Recognizing the Book That Needs to Be Written." New York Times 17 June 2002. 2 Nov. 2002 http://www.nytimes.com

Hendrickson, Dyke. Quiet Presence. Portland: Guy Gannett Co., 1980. 1-266. 

Roby, Yves. The Franco-Americans of New-England: Dreams and Realities. Septentrion, 2004. 1-533. 

Rollins, John H. Hidden Minorities:The Persistence of Ethnicity in American Life. Washington D.C.: University P of America, Inc., 1981. 1-257. 

The French Review, Vol. 57, No. 5. (Apr., 1984), pp. 641-656.

Wade, Mason.  1950.  The French Parish and Survivance in the Nineteenth Century New England.  Catholic Historical Review.   

Wednesday's Child. Brunswick: Maine Writers & Alliance, 1997. 1-89.


[1][1] Racial and Ethnic Crash: Examining Wounds (pg. 3) by Lisa Helstrom, November 14, 2005, SO 252 Colby College, Professor Gilkes
 
___________________________________________________________________________________________
 

Exhibit 009

1880 United States Federal Census

 
 ________________________________________________________________________________




Exhibit 0010


One of the main stitching rooms at the Royal Worcester Corset, Co., Worcester, Massachusetts

 
 
Female employees at work in one of the main stitching rooms at the Royal Worcester Corset Co., Worcester, Massachusetts in 1902.  The photograph shows nearly 700 women and girls at work at the nearly 500 electrically powered sewing machines.  Royal Worcester Corset Co. was started in 1861 by David Hale Fanning.  At its height it employed nearly 2000 people.  The factory closed in 1950.
 
Source: Image from page 141 of the Worcester Magazine, October, 1902 (Vol. IV No.4) in the article "The Making of Corsets".  Published by the Worcester Board of Trade.
 
______________________________________________________________________________________________


Exhibit 0011

Note: the following image is an extraction of the information contained on the actual 1920 census document.  The size of the actual document does not lend itself to this medium very well.

 
____________________________________________________________________________
 
 
Exhibit 0012 A
 
 
 
 
_____________________________________________________________________________
 
Exhibit 0012 B
 
 
 
__________________________________________________________________________________
 
Exhibit 0012 C
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________________
 
Exhibit 0013
 

Note: some parts of this narrative can be a bit tough to read but I have kept it exactly as I had received it from Clark Callear.  It poses some intriguing questions and is interesting to ponder.  It is certainly worth the effort to read. 
fhl

 


NOTES FOR MY DAVID RELATIVES

by Clark Edmond Callear (March 4, 2010)

 Update for those interested in my research of our Callear Hebrew and Huguenot heritage. Yesterday, while researching New England (later USA) Huguenots, I discovered that my 9th Great Grandmother MARIE ARMAND emigrated to New York in 1677. I knew the name from our family genealogy records. She is my 9th Great Grandmother and was married to our Grandfather GUILLAUME. "Guillaume" translates into English as "William" so, at first, I overlooked the fact that Guillaume and Marie are directly documented in this French research as New York Huguenots (© Michel Barbeau, 1998)... These are our grandparents: American citizens 100 years prior to the Declaration of Independence. VERY COOL. These are my dad's (Ted's) 8th Great Grandparents. This Guillaume has a 6th Great Grandpa (Born 1350 in Normandy, France and my son Zach’s 18th GG) with the exact same name: "Guillaume DAVID" (be careful not to confuse the 2). So the Huguenot confirmation of our Hebrew ancestors is firmly and directly established with these records. This scholar’s work verifies mine. He came at it from an American approach and I came at it from France and Quebec. Below are his findings translated from French (excuse the sometimes strange phraseology or repetition via translation):

Following are translations by me (Clark Callear using Google) from a French website. The publisher of these French records has copyrighted them as follows:
“Copyright Permission is granted to reproduce information from this file with the reference source. We invite you to a link to the homepage Huguenots file indicating the source. © Michel Barbeau, 1998 “

Mr Barbeau is from Quebec. He also has a website titled “Huguenots in New France” (Which is very pertinent to our Callear/Clairmont/Cadot/Lemay ancestry… shown below). I have provided a translated version of some of the David-related portions of this Huguenot website for you to "copy and paste" into your browser if you like:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://pages.infinit.net/barbeaum/fichier/fichieab.htm&ei=FGqOS76aI5KXlAeOsq2XDQ&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAkQ7gEwAQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Guillaume%2BDavid%2522%2BNew%2BYork%2Bhuguenot%26hl%3Den

Below is specific evidence proving that our David ancestors were definitely Huguenots... not to mention Hebrews directly descending from King David of Old Testament times. The evidence below backs up what I have already traced on my own.

In essence I have now traced my son Zach's ancestry all the way back to Adam and Eve. Most of his Grandmothers and Grandfathers in this David line are very well sourced and documented, especially the Quebec and New York time periods. The best genealogy publication is none other 2 Coat of Arms let me know. I have only found some that I don’t trust to be authentic. than the Bible itself. I am looking for a photo of the David Coat of Arms where our GGGGGGGGGG… Great Grandfather KING DAVID is honored. I have read about it but have not found it. If any of you reading this has the authentic Coat of Arms let me know. I have only found some that I don’t trust to be authentic.

Please email me at clark@callear.org  WITH ANYTHING YOU HAVE.
Thanks,Clark CallearOrofino, Idaho USA

More info follows:Also [See below for Clark’s FinalNote and Recap]Also below is our farthest Hebrew genealogy line I have for my son Zachary(using the Bible Genealogies were ach Adam and Eve):

Following is Michel Barbeau’s Huguenot research translated into English:
############################################
           "File Huguenots Name, surname: Original French text: Marie Armand Origin: unknown origin in France [Clark's accurate research says: Bracquemont, Archev. de Rouen, Normandie, FRANCE]Spouse: Original French text: Guillaume [William] David. Wedding Date: 1656 in Trois-Rivières, France Proof: Confirmed on 10/8/1659 at Quebec, shegoes to New England with her husband in 1677, at least one of his grandchildren will be baptized at the Reformed Church of NewYork NOTES: The couple returns to France, are found in La Rochelle in 1711 [Guillaume’s death]Sources: DGFQ [René Jetté, Dictionnaire Quebec families]
Name, surname: Original French text: Guillaume [William] DAVIDOrigin: Unknown Origin in France [Clark'saccurate research saysBracquemont, Rouen, Normandy, France]Spouse: Armand Marie (see this name)Wedding date: 1656, Trois-Rivières, France Proof: Confirmed on 10/08/1659 at Quebec, the couple spent in New England with her husband in 1677, at least one of his grandchildren will be baptized at the Reformed Church of New York NOTES: The couple returns to France, are found in La Rochelle in 1711 Sources: DGFQi [René Jetté, Dictionnaire Quebec families]***

########################################

Continued: I had translated this portion about Guillaume’s daughter Madeleine(1666-1714)before I realized that Guillaume (William) and his wife Marie Armand were listed specifically by name:
“Introduction:
This file contains the names of 319 Huguenots that I have identified to date. Included in this file reports the Huguenots in New France is that they have been crossing into New France, they stayed there a while and they settled there. Despite all the rigor that I have shown it is possible that some errors if you find an error or have information which may correct or expand this file, please contact me.

The file is listed alphabetically by surname, click for accécéder section containing the first letter of surname:
This database hold the name of 321 Huguenots who stayed or etablished in New France from the beginning of the colony to 1763. The file is in alphabetical order. Click on the section of your choice.

"File Huguenots
Name, surname: David, Madeleine
Origin: Trois-Riviere, born 15/2/1666, daughter of the previous
Spouse Wedding Date place: Jacques Lepage (see that name [below]), around 1683, New York. (Note: Lepages are Callear/Lemays ancestors also).
Proof: At least one of the couple's children was christened at the Reformed Church of New York
Source: DGFQ [René Jetté, Dictionnaire Quebec families] FMNA [Marcel Fournier, From New England to New France (Note: many Fourniers are Callear ancestors)]"

Name, surname: Lepage, Jacques
Origin: Touraine, [né vers 1656 Touraine], born around 1656
Spouse, Wedding Date, place: Madeleine David [daughter of Zach Callear's 10th Great Grandpa Guillaume David and sister of Zach's 9th Gr Grandpa Jacques DAVID, b. 1657] Madeleine David (see this name) m. about 1693, New England
Proof: Confirmed on 10/02/1669 at Quebec, his daughter Suzanne (see that name) is baptized in the Reformed Church of New York
NOTES: Soldier in the Carignan Regiment, moved to New England after his dismissal, EA Montreal back in 1699
Sources: FMNA [Marcel Fournier, From New England to New France (Note: many Fourniers are Callear ancestors)], DGFQ [René Jetté, Dictionnaire Quebec families] DGCOMP [Genealogical Dictionary of Quebec families, corrections and additions in 1997]”

For those of us who descend from Guillaume David or from Jacques Lepage and Madeleine David (1666-1714) (and more) I have translated the whole website at:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://pages.infinit.net/barbeaum/fichier/fichieab.htm&ei=FGqOS76aI5KXlAeOsq2XDQ&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAkQ7gEwAQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Guillaume%2BDavid%2522%2BNew%2BYork%2Bhuguenot%26hl%3Den

[See below for Clark’s Final Note and Recap]4

èThis is the farthest genealogy line I have for my son Zachary:
Zachary Clark CALLEAR, b. 4 Oct 1986 Lewiston, Idaho USA
•Father: Clark Edmond CALLEAR, b. December 9, 1954 Fort Bragg, North Carolina, USA
•Father: Edmond D'Orville 'Ted Edmond Callear' CLAIRMONT, b. Feb 6, 1934 North Bay,
Ontario, Canada
•Father: Joseph Augustus CLAIRMONT, 1903-1984, Gravenhurst, Ontario, Canada
•Mother: Elmire Marie CADOTTE (1867-1960), Massey, Ontario, Canada •Mother: Marie Seraphine HONORINE LEMAY (1843-1919) Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
•Father: François Lemay (1814-1898) Ste-Anne-des-Plaines, Terrebonne, Quebec, Canada
•Mother: Marie MARQUERITE DAVID (1791-1832) Sault-au-Récollet, Montréal, Québec, Canada
==>NOTE: So far my research has shown all above are Christians.

All were Catholic until my dad Ted Callear converted to Protestant in the 1950s.
Marie is a daughter of a long line of Davids.
At this point the Davids are Catholic but are descendants of Christian Huguenots, as well as being descendants of Israel (Tribe of Judah as shown below).
•Father: Jacques Amable DAVID (1755-1834) Ile De Montreal,,Quebec,Canada
•Father: Jacques DAVID (1717-1793) Chambly, , Quebec, Canada
•Father: Jacques Amable DAVID (1693-1727) Chambly, Chambly, Québec, Canada
•Father: Jacques David (1657-1708) Trois Rivieres, St Maurice, Quebec, Canada
•Father: Guillaume DAVID (1636-1711) Bracquemont, Rouen, Normandy, France
 
==>NOTE: In 1678 (on official Canadian records) Guillaume stated his religion to be "Huguenot"

•Father: Blaise Didier DAVID (1597-1662) Notra Dame De Bracquemont, Diocese Rouen,
Normandie, France
•Father: Rambert David (1560-) Rouen, Normandie, France
•Father: Pierre David III (1535-1441) Normandy, France
•Father: Claude David (1490-1701) Normandy, France
•Father: Henri David (1455-) Normandy, France

==>NOTE: Henri's wife was Anna de Bois-Bourdon. Her father, Sébastien de Bois de Bourdon

(Zach's 16th Great Grandfather), was Queen Isabeau's lover. He was ordered to be drowned by the King of France when Bois-Bourdon refused to bow to him or explain his amorous adventures.*

•Father: Bertrand David (1420-) Normandy, France
•Father: Pierre David II (1385-1441) France
•Father: Guillaume David (1350-) Normandy, France
•Father: Jean David (1310-) Normandy, France
•Father: Gilles David (1270-) Normandy, France
•Father: Pierre David (1230-) Normandy, France
•Father: Julien de St Etienne DAVID (Bet. 1200-1212) St Etienne, Ardeche, Rhone-Alpes,
France - "Owns castles in Pravieux"*

==>NOTE: Julien is First Christian Christening in the David line.**
 
The Bondesen-David [herein joined by Callear] family tree starts in 1150 (France).*
"The family crest was in honour of King David of Israel"*

 
Clark’s Final Note and Recap:
I have traced our Davids directly to Julien de St Etienne DAVID (Born Bet. 1200-1212) St Etienne, Ardeche, Rhone-Alpes, FranceSome of the records go back to 1150 showing that Julien was the first Christian Christening in the David line (French Jews converting to Catholicism).**
-Records said that Julien de St Etienne DAVID "Owns castles in Pravieux"*
-The Bondesen-David [herein joined by Callear] family tree starts in 1150 (France).*
-"The family crest was in honour of King David of Israel"*  

From Ancestry.com:

Title: The Origin of the David Surname
Description: Location: Babylon (Iraq)
Attached To: Julien David (born 1200)
http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/ViewStory.aspx?tid=2987411&pid=-1776708815&did=395db3dd-ac2d-4d3c-b3f1-da8eb6a2e8c3&src=search

According to Jewish historians and scholars, Julien de St Etienne David was a direct lineal descendant of Makir Theodoric (Thierry) David, who was the Exilarch of the Jews of the Babylonian Captivity who during the reign of Charlemagne had come with his family to France from Babylon. [Callears also descend directly from Charlemagne 4-6 different ways. I have 4 of these family trees firmly established]
 
The family of the Makir settled first at Narbonne, and thereafter his descendants settled in the Duchy of Normandy, keeping the surname of David to signify their descent from the Kings of Judah and Israel. 
Thus the lineage of Julien de St Etienne David would be traced back first to Makir Theodoric David, and his forebear Hannini David, and through the Exilarchs back to King Jehoiachin of Judah, the brother of King Zedekiah the last King of Judah. From King Jehoiachin the royal line would descend back to King Solomon and then to his father King David, the son of Jesse, who was chosen by God and anointed by Samuel to be King over Israel.

Citations:

*Compiled by Pierre-France Bondesen-David [Translated from French]. All Rights Reserved, 2009. ARBRE GENEALOGIQUE (BRANCHE PATERNELLE) DE BEATRICE, VICTORIA, & CHARLES-VASA BONDESEN-DAVID.
**Database online: Record for Julien DAVID
***The specific research pertaining to our Huguenot Davids (17th Century) is translated into English at:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://pages.infinit.net/barbeaum/fichier/fichieab.htm&ei=FGqOS76aI5KXlAeOsq2XDQ&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAkQ7gEwAQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Guillaume%2BDavid%2522%2BNew%2BYork%2Bhuguenot%26hl%3Den

A few more related tidbits:

FROM: Bloodline of the Holy Grail, September 28, 2005

By Margaret C. Jacob "grail buff"

Laurence Gardner's above-cited book helps us understand what went on here: on p. 185, it reads "after their defeat by Charles Martel in the 730s, the Islamic Moors retreated to the city of Narbonne in the South of France, which became their base for further military resistance. This posed a difficult problem for Pepin the Short, who duly sought assistance from the Jews of Narbonne. He finally gained their support - but at a price. The Jews agreed to deal with the problem if Pepin guaranteed the setting up of a Jewish kingdom within the territory of Burgundy - a kingdom that would have at its head a recognized descendant of the Royal House of David."

"Pepin agreed and the Jews defeated the Moors from within the city. The Jewish kingdom of Septimania (the Midi) was then established in 768, from Nimes to the Spanish frontier, with Narbonne as its capital. The previous governor of the region was the Merovingian, Theuderic IV (Thierry) who had been ousted from power in Neustria and Burgundy by Charles Martel in 737. Theuderic (known to the Moors as Makir Theodoric) was married to Pepin the Short's sister Alda. It was their son, Count Guilhelm [Guillaume] de Toulouse, who then acceded to the new throne as the King of Septimania in 768. Guilhelm was not only of Merovingian lineage, BUT WAS A RECOGNIZED POTENTATE OF JUDAH, HOLDING THE DISTINCTION OF ISAAC IN the patriarchy." (also ours)

"Pepin's son, Charles, was the ruler who became known as Charlemagne the Great. As King of the Franks from 771 and Emperor of the West from 800, Charlemagne was pleased to confirm Guilhelm's entitlement to dynastic sovereignty in Septimania. The appointment was also upheld by the Caliph of Baghdad and, reluctantly, by Pope Stephen in Rome. All acknowledged King Guilhelm of the House of Judah to be a true bloodline successor of King David. Guilhelm was particularly influential at the Carolingian court. . . . . . and founded his own monastery at Gellone. . . his sons were. . . (lots of good info) . . More than 300 years later, the Davidic succession was still extant in the Spanish Midi. . " Also good backup sources mentioned. . .”

Also: as Callears, Lemays, Cadots, Davids, Cloutiers, Clairmonts, LaFontaines, and Dubords we descend from Charlemagne in 4 ways that I have documented and probably in 2 more ways that seem likely. My son Zachary also, through his mother (LeeAnn Durfee), descends from many Kings and Queens of Scotland through his ancestor Sir Thomas Paine. Cool stuff—clark March 4, 2010


 ====================================================================
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 











 
 
 
 















 
 

 

 


 

 




No comments:

Post a Comment